| |
|
pornography debate
Title: pornography debate
Category: Law & Government / Government & Politics
Details: Words: 4293 | Pages: 18.3 (approximately 235 words/page)
pornography debate
Suppose one accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin's suggested
statutory definition of pornography. How does one who
generally accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin's views on the
pervasively harmful effect of pornography, and who accepts a need
for legal redress of the harms perpetrated by pornography, deal
with pornographic material?
The ordinance proposed by MacKinnon and Dworkin would deal
with such material by enacting legislation which gives people
adversely affected by the works, which clearly fit their
definition of …showed first 75 words of 4293 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
|
|
…showed last 75 words of 4293 total…either case, the Ontario courts have
available to them the conceptual tools to deal with the matter.
The addition of the indeterminate perpetrators doctrine from
the DES case would be a welcome addition to the judicial
treatment of a modified ordinance, but successful actions would
not depend on it. It is not impossible to imagine the kind of
material that would be claimed to be harmful - it would
contain pictures or words where w
------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Bibliography**
Need a custom written paper?
|
|
|
