None Provided2
Title: None Provided2
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 446 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
None Provided2
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 446 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Developing a procedurally Just performance appraisal process
When organizations make decisions about people, such as whom to hire or promote, appraisal ratings or merit raise to give, or how important that the decisions are seen as fair and just. Research has shown that at least two aspects of justice influence employees’’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment and both must be considered in organization decisions.
The first type is distributive justice, or the perceived fairness of
showed first 75 words of 446 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 446 total
ratee can appeal or rebut the evaluation and when raters are familiar with ratee’s work, solicit employee input before assigning ratings, provide prompt feedback, and allow two way communication in the appraisal process. In addition, procedures should be more likely to be perceived as fair if employees understand the rating dimensions and superior’s expectations well before the rating takes place. Ideally, ratees would also have input into determining the rating criteria.
Bibliography
none